Right now it seems like its “A.I.”. Still big now are the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. Recently we had COVID 19.

What’s next?

  • @Zeroxxx
    link
    fedilink
    72 months ago

    Energy generation evolution I suppose. We are reaching the limit of how we generate energy. Need that Dyson Sphere for real.

    • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Are we? There’s still plenty of space for solar and wind. Including large battery installations for cities. It doesn’t really feel like we’re hitting a limit there anytime soon.

      • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We are not. Not yet, anyway; energy growth has been exponential historically, so it might “only” be a century.

        Even if we had limitless energy, though, Earth can only radiate so much heat. I’ve seen it calculated as 400 years of growth max, generously. Before then we have to just stop growing, or leave Earth. All that to say fusion is probably the last energy tech we’ll ever need.

        • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Stationary batteries with no limit on weight or even temperature should be way easier. It just comes down to how much easier exactly. If someone finds a cheap enough chemistry that is the next big thing.

          Failing that, pumped water or air energy storage is decent, if a bit more awkward to install.

        • @jaycifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          While I agree that there needs to be some big growth in portable batteries like those in EVs, there are options for cities. Since they wouldn’t need to move, heavier and denser batteries become feasible. I’ve heard good things about molten salt batteries.

        • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Right now I could buy an EV with 520km range for 36k€. It’s rapidly getting better.

          • @Zeroxxx
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Now tell me how long do you need to charge that from 0 to 100%? 🤭

            You do know EV sales stall because of that, right? And the concern of battery lifespan.

            • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              You do realize most people charge at home? It doesn’t matter how long it takes when the car is just sitting there (you’ll even save time compared to driving to the gas station).

              Manufacturers also give 7+ years warranty on batteries by now, but even after 10 years a battery doesn’t just break, you only lose a few percent of range (if this wasn’t already calculated into the buffer, depends on the car).

              You do know EV sales stall because of that, right?

              In what fantasy world are you living? EVs just hit an all-times sales record last year. This is for the US, but it’s similar all over the world:

              • @Zeroxxx
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You know people’s biggest limitation when purchasing is EV range compared to fossil fuel right?

                Last year? What year is it now?

                • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  No, it’s not. Most people, even in the US, can easily use the range. You don’t go to a cross country roadtrip every day.

                  You drive to work, go grocery shopping, drive home and that’s usually it. A range of 400km+ with new EVs is easily enough. Or do you drive to the gas station every 2 days with your current car?

                  And even if you go on a roadtrip, after driving for 4 hours you might want to take a break anyway.

                  You do realize there is no data available for the future? We aren’t there yet.

      • @Zeroxxx
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This has nothing to do with cheap or expensive.

        Solar panel only generates that much energy, efficiency is stagnant. Turn off all fossil fuel generators and we are all in the dark.

          • @Zeroxxx
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            If it was that simple, China would have done it already.

              • @Zeroxxx
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Even China cant stop using fossil energy.

                To make Solar Panels you need to dig silicon, cadmium, tellurium, and selenium.

                To store the energy generated you need aluminium, cobalt, iron, lead, lithium, manganese, nickel and graphite.

                All of which require tremendeous amount of fossil fuel energy.

                You want to scale it up? Destroying the earth in the process…

                As I said, we need new evolution in getting energy.